|
IN THIS ISSUE:

Rural Mountain West Takes the Lead on Climate Adaptation
By Jeff Morris
The
first thing La Plata County Commissioner Wally White can say
when asked about the Mountain Studies Institute (MSI) is,
“boy are these people dedicated”. White
should know. In addition to being a county
commissioner
for the last 6 years, for the last 12 months he has
also been a governing board member for the rural scientific
research station. Serving communities in the San Juan
Mountains, White characterizes the rural mountainous area of
Southwestern Colorado as a “heart and soul location” for a
scientific research station.
With
the local economy tied to natural resources utilization,
especially tourism, effective delivery of scientific data to
the entire community, including federal partners, is a
significant asset. Commissioner White, who also sits on
the NACO Public
Lands Committee,
attests, “during the last thirty years, we have witnessed
changing climate patterns in this region and we’re lucky to
have an organization that is on the leading edge of much of
the data collection and analysis.”
Climate
variability and its effect on the forests, watersheds and
communities of the west has been a significant focus for the
institute and this was further highlighted this October when
MSI held its 3rd regional Climate Conference:
Managing for Resiliency in the San Juan Mountains.
MSI, with their partners San Juan Public Lands Center (SJPLC),
University of Colorado-Boulder, and Fort Lewis College,
hosted over 120 scientists, managers, planners, and
community members who presented tools, strategies and
lessons learned from Colorado, the Four Corners area, and
across the country. The dialog focused on identifying
solutions to the changes in the environment that are
resulting from changes to the region’s climate.
Speakers at the conference ranged from San Juan
County Commissioner Ernest Kuhlman
to
Model Forest Policy Program’s Community Coordinator, Will
Paddock, and state elected leaders such as
Colorado State Senator Bruce Whitehead. Dave Erley,
Mayor of Castle Valley, Utah, and 2010 Climate Solutions
University participant, was also a featured speaker.
For the last seven months MSI has also been participating in
Climate Solutions University (CSU), an on-line
educational campus that provides a framework to assist rural
forested communities with on-the-ground solutions to climate
adaptation. By learning how to maintain healthy
forests, these communities: conserve water resources,
protect citizens from flooding, drought, and health hazards,
sequester carbon, maintain natural habitat, and build a
sustainable baseline for resource oriented jobs and
recreation.
MSI
Executive Director Marcie Bidwell, who is the lead on the
project, emphasized how the CSU tools helped MSI collaborate
over wide landscapes with varied ownership.
“Although we always intellectually knew this was the case,
getting a visual picture of how these organizations were
involved in the same landscapes and watersheds really made a
difference not only in our outreach to those managers but
also in communicating that reality to our local community,”
says Bidwell.
Bidwell also acknowledged that while MSI has always had a
strong core of science, the tools provided by Climate Solutions
University have given them new strategies to engage the
community by utilizing scientific methods for problem
solving. CSU tools
also helped MSI
local government and regional partners. “Our mission is to
match the needs of our community with the best available
science in a way that makes it meaningful and effective,”
says Bidwell. “We’re thrilled with the support we’ve
received from our
local government and federal agency partners in the region~
It’s really great to see.”
“We
want to achieve three goals out of this conference,” says
Bidwell. “We hope that this results in an online tool box
for the San Juan Mountains, advances our collaborative
relationships, and drives overall landscape planning between
the local, state and federal agencies, all in the context of
climate adaptation.”
Moisture, in the form of rain and snow, is coming later and
leaving earlier. This reality is supported by both
anecdotal observations by community members like
Commissioner White and data collected by MSI and their
partners. “We can all see it, but seeing it and
understanding the impacts are two different things,” says
White. “That’s why MSI is so important to us. By combining
scientific data and community needs we can be sure that
we’re working towards the best outcomes for our people and
our place.”
For more information on Mountain Studies Institute visit:
http://www.mountainstudies.org/
For
more information and resources on Climate Solutions
University visit:
http://www.mfpp.org/csu
- Jeff Morris is the Communications
Coordinator for the Model Forest Policy Program.
RETURN TO INDEX
Recreation and Education Benefits of Wetlands
Wetlands
enhance natural aesthetics and provide recreational venues
for fishing, swimming, boating, hiking and much more.
Wetlands also provide educational opportunities for school
children and opportunities for academic research, thus
serving as living laboratories to learn about organisms,
ecosystems and the environment as a whole. They serve as an
outdoor classroom where students can apply what they learn
in various subjects to their environment.
Did you
know? At least $18 billion in economic activity is
generated annually by the 17 million Americans that
participate in coastal wetland-dependent recreational
fishing.
County Spotlight –
Worcester County, Maryland
Accounting
for 473 square miles, this small but growing coastal county
has a unique population composition. Eight months a year
the county has an estimated 70,000 full- and part-time
residents, however, during the summer months the influx of
summer residents and tourists visiting Ocean City MD create
a population surge to upwards of 300,000 people.
In 2001,
Worcester County was awarded a $9,000 Five Star Restoration
Grant to restore county stream banks through its Stream
Restoration, Enrichment and Attitudes for Success (SEAS)
program. SEAS offered at-risk youth the opportunity to
participate in scientific research by restoring stream banks
and monitoring water quality. The students removed
non-native vegetation from approximately 1,400 feet of three
area stream banks and monitored an additional 7.5 miles of
stream bank. The success of the program was featured on the
local television station and has received additional support
through the Maryland Coastal Bays Program to continue in the
future. To learn more about Worcester County’s program
access
www.mdcoastalbays.org.
Reprinted with permission,
National Association of Counties.
RETURN TO INDEX
Protecting Biodiversity in San
Miguel County, CO
By
WildEarth Guardians
Commissioner Joan May takes her job seriously. Seriously
enough that on a wintry spring morning, she rose before dawn
to witness one of nature’s more unusual spectacles—Gunnison
sage-grouse engaged in elaborate courtship displays at one
of their few remaining leks in Colorado.
Gunnison sage-grouse have suffered significant population declines
and presently occur on less than ten percent of their
historic range.
San Miguel
County, working with their constituents, leads a coalition
of conservation, bird protection and government
accountability organizations to protect Gunnison sage-grouse
and their habitat. Interestingly, diverse constituents
including conservationists and ranchers are unified in
preserving the species. Locally appropriate regulations
protect habitat while ensuring that all stakeholders have
opportunities for input.
The
county’s leadership on sage-grouse conservation also extends
beyond its borders. In 2006, after six years of
deliberation, the Bush II Administration declined to list
Gunnison sage-grouse under the Endangered Species Act. The San Miguel County
Board of Commissioners voted unanimously to join a notice of
intent to sue the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service over the
negative listing decision. Five months later the county
became lead plaintiff in a lawsuit challenging the
decision, and also enacted additional local land use
regulations to protect the grouse.
In August
2009, the Fish and Wildlife Service agreed to reconsider its
negative listing decision for Gunnison sage-grouse, and San
Miguel County was at the head of the table for those
settlement negotiations. The Service finally announced the
new listing decision for Gunnison sage-grouse last month,
having decided that Gunnison sage-grouse are “warranted but
precluded” from listing at this time. Once again, San Miguel
County led local voices in criticizing the resultant lack of
federal protection for the species.
As a leader
in Gunnison sage-grouse conservation, San Miguel County has
influenced innumerable conservation efforts and decisions in
southwest Colorado. The county has achieved its vision for
maintaining resident’s quality of life while protecting the
biodiversity that is the foundation for healthy communities
and the environment.
In the
meantime, Commissioner May gets out into the field as often
as possible. She is amazed by the creative ways people have
protected sage-grouse. In some cases they work on increasing
habitat, in others they work on ways to reduce non-native
predators. In every case, she sees thoughtful and innovative
work as people collaborate to achieve their goals.
For more information, go to:
www.wildearthguardians.org/.
RETURN TO INDEX
From
the Director
. . .
As
you know, the Conservation Leaders Network is the only
nationwide organization that focuses on working with county
commissioners to protect America’s natural resources.
As with
most charities, it’s been a rough year for the Conservation
Leaders Network. Foundation funding continues to be low;
new members are hard to come by as everyone hunkers down
with the bad economy.
But the
good news is that the Conservation Leaders Network has
survived, when many other organizations have disappeared. I
think it has to do with the fact that we have always been a
very lean organization and have always remained true to our
founding purpose.
When other
charities were advised to cut programs that didn’t advance
their mission, the Conservation Leaders Network didn’t need
to make adjustments, as we have never had projects that
didn’t advance our mission.
When other
groups were told to eliminate staff, the Conservation
Leaders Network kept our staff but reduced hours.
True, it
has been a challenge, and we aren’t out of the water yet.
You will see that our list of accomplishments this year is
shorter than last year, and that’s a direct result of the
economy and reductions in revenue and staff time.
What we
accomplished this year:
-
Clean
Water for All: Local Officials Speak Out for Clean Water”
Our colorful and informative report featuring nine
counties (Martin County FL, Clackamas County OR, Calumet
County WI, Santa Barbara County CA, St. Louis County MN,
Dane County WI, Lane County OR, St. Clair County AL and
Matthews County VA), which you can access at our website
at: www.conservationleaders.org.
-
The “Water Policy Report” published an article about our
“Clean Water for All” report under the headline: “County
Officials Split Over Efforts To Clarify Clean Water Act’s
Scope.” We couldn’t have asked for a better headline, as
this clearly points out that the National Association of
Counties’ anti-clean water position is not shared by all
county officials. InsideEPA.com also featured the report.
-
We also
organized the public launch of “Local Officials for Clean
Water” during the National Association of Counties annual
conference. Speakers included Supervisor Susan Adams of
Marin County CA, Commissioner Chuck McGrady of
Henderson
County
NC,
Commissioner Carol Fordonski of Queen Anne’s
County
MD and Commissioner Pete Sorenson of
Lane
County
OR.
-
We are
encouraging counties to pass resolutions in support of
clean water. In addition to Orange County NC and
Washington County PA, I just learned that Hardin County IA
recently did so.
-
We
brought our "Conservation Makes $ense" booth to the
National Association of Counties’ Annual Conference in
Reno NV, to show support for pro-environment county
officials and to make new contacts. This year we had two
booth co-sponsors: the Wilderness Society and the Pew
Environment Group (both of which co-sponsored the booth
last year, also). We weren’t able to attend the
Legislative Conference in March 2010 due to funding
limitations, but we will be there in 2011. And next
year’s Annual Conference will be in
Portland
OR;
we’ve already got a commitment from our first booth
co-sponsor.
-
We
expanded our marine conservation work to the entire West
Coast this year. We generated letters in support of
the Marine Life Protection Act process in California and
are continuing to work in this arena. We were able
to attend a conference focusing on the impacts of climate
change on the Pacific.
-
Helped three O&C county commissioners publish an opinion piece
on the 2.5 million acres of
BLM-managed federal forest land.
-
Successfully advocated in
Mono County CA for the rejection of a resolution in support
of withdrawing lands from Wilderness Study Areas for mining.
-
We notified
CLN members of 40 funding opportunities for natural resource protection and
restoration.
RETURN TO INDEX
Investing Cap-and-Trade Proceeds in Local Climate Action
Climate
Communities is a national coalition of local government
entities working for strong national cap-and-trade
legislation that supports investment in a sustainable, clean
energy American economy. This should include a substantial
investment in local government climate action.
The Critical Role of
Localities in Meeting the Climate Challenge
Local and
regional governments have been at the forefront of the
movement to combat climate change. Mayors from more than 900
cities have signed the Mayors’ Climate Protection Agreement
pledging to take actions in their communities to cut
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Approximately 40 counties
representing over 35 million people have joined a Cool
Counties and pledged to reduce GHG emissions by 80 percent
by the year 2050. [The Conservation Leaders Network is the
home of Cool Counties. Learn more at our website:
www.conservationleaders.org/cool.counties.) More than
425 local elected officials have signed the Climate
Communities’ “Empowering Local Government Climate Action: A
Blueprint for President Obama and the 111th Congress.”
Local
leadership is critical to addressing America’s climate
change challenge. More than any other sector, localities
have the ability to promote, encourage and lead the effort
to reduce GHG pollution:
-
Efficient Buildings – Local governments are uniquely
suited to implement new building codes and other incentives
designed to cut energy use in buildings. Commercial and
residential building are responsible for 40 percent of the
nation’s GHG emissions.
-
Community-Scale Renewables & Smart Meter Infrastructure
– Local governments can lead the deployment of
community-scale renewable energy and smart meter
infrastructure.
-
Alternative
Fuel Vehicles, Fleets & Infrastructure – Local
governments are best suited to foster the deployment of
alternative fuel vehicles and infrastructure in the public
and private sectors.
-
Efficient
Transportation – Localities can implement transit, land
use, smart growth, and other transportation programs needed
to reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT), a critical component
of any national strategy to reduce carbon emissions.
-
Green
Infrastructure – Local governments will play the lead
role in the deployment of green infrastructure that can
prevent and mitigate GHG emissions.
-
Green Jobs &
Businesses – Local governments play a critical role in
the development of green jobs and green businesses.
-
First
Responders to Climate Impacts –
Local governments are the first
responders to the impacts of climate change, and must take
the lead in dealing with drought, water shortages,
wildfires, flooding, rising sea levels, infrastructure
disruption, and other impacts of climate change.
If localities are not able to
foster substantial reductions in GHG emissions in their
jurisdictions, America will fail to meet the climate
challenge.
Permission to reprint granted by
Climate Communities,
www.climatecommunities.us.
RETURN TO INDEX
The
Endangered Species Act: Conserving Montana’s Natural
Heritage
Since 1973,
the Endangered Species Act has protected and restored rare
plants and animals and their habitat across America. Just
some of the many beneficiaries have been Rocky Mountain gray
wolves, California condors, and rare wildflowers, as well as
millions of Americans who now have opportunities to enjoy
irreplaceable wildlife. Below are a few Montana species
helped by this landmark law.
Bald
eagle recovers
Fish and Wildlife Service, photo by Mike Lockare
1978: 12
pairs in the state
2005: 316
pairs in Montana
Bald eagles
are “going gangbusters” in Montana, says a state wildlife
biologist. In 1963, just 417 pairs were counted in the
entire U.S. Following the ban of the pesticide DDT and
Endangered Species Act protection and restoration, eagles
rebounded nationwide. In 1999, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service upgraded the eagle’s status to the less-imperiled
threatened category. Removal from the endangered species
list is now pending. [Editor's Note: The bald
eagle was removed from the endangered species list in June,
2007. Although this is not a new article, we decided
that the good news needed to be more widely shared, and good
news is something we can all use these days! In order
to reprint this article, we were required to reprint it
verbatim.]
“I was
privileged enough . . . to have had on more than one
occasion the majestic, patriotic and humbling experience of
viewing a bald eagle soar overhead. This should be an
experience that every American should partake in and only
through strengthening our Endangered Species Act will this
be able to continue.”
—Chris
Henderson, Missoula, Montana
“I moved to
western Montana 25 years ago as I love outdoor activities .
. . At that time you might go an entire winter and only see
2 or 3 bald eagles. Now you may see 60 to 80 a season! . . .
I have also seen a mountain lion and a variety of bears,
even a couple of grizzlies . . . Wildlife diversity is very
important to me, as is protecting wild habitat. We should
not stand by, nor legislate, that some species are not
important enough to deserve our protection.”
—Christine
Daum, Stevensville, Montana
“Growing up
in Washington DC, I was well aware of our national bird, but
I had never seen one. To me, the bald eagle was [merely] an
emblem—not something that existed in reality. It was not
until I moved to Montana that I became acquainted with the
bald eagle as something more than a symbol. Now, hiking in
Paradise Valley or paddling down the Gallatin River, I have
seen several bald eagles, and each time I do, my heart skips
with excitement and wonder. I don't think I will ever tire
of spotting these huge and striking birds. .”
—Evan
Louise Rick, Bozeman, Montana
Peregrine falcons off the endangered list
Late 1970s:
0 peregines nesting in the state
2004: At
least 59 pairs in Montana
After
peregrines nearly vanished from the lower 48 states, a ban
on the pesticide DDT allowed them to nest successfully
again. The Peregrine Fund, a private organization,
contributed captive-bred and captive-reared peregrines to
the recovery effort, and worked with government agencies to
reintroduce them. In Montana, peregrines were released in
the Centennial Valley beginning in 1981. In 1984, the first
wild pair to return to Montana nested on a Centennial Valley
cliff.
Montana’s
wildlife benefits both citizens and the local economy
U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, photo by William Campbell
Over the
past decade, the reintroduction and recovery of the gray
wolf in Yellowstone exceeded projected benefits for the
local economy and ecosystem. Wolf tourism contributes $23
million a year to Yellowstone gateway communities alone,
according to a 2005 estimate by University of Montana
economists. Biologists have noted that the wolf’s return to
Yellowstone changed elk grazing patterns, resulting in more
plant growth on stream banks and in aspen stands.
That, in
turn, expanded songbird habitat. On ranchlands, Defenders of
Wildlife compensates livestock owners with market value for
proven losses from wolf depredation.
National Wildlife Refuges such as Red Rock Lakes and
Medicine Lake generate local income from both Montana
residents and tourists who come to see endangered and other
birds.
Local partners work together to help
Montana’s rare species and habitats
Across the
nation, there’s growing recognition that cooperative
partnerships and incentives for private landowners are the
most effective ways to recover endangered species, and in
many cases keep species from ever becoming endangered.
That’s the case in Montana, where farmers, ranchers, and
businesses are joining with conservation groups and local,
state, and federal government agencies to conserve rare
wildlife and habitats. A couple of examples:
•
In the Blackfoot River Valley, ranchers, government
agencies, timber companies, and conservation organizations
formed the Blackfoot Challenge, with a goal of preserving
ranches, the rural lifestyle, and the river and valley.
Using government programs, some with financial incentives,
these landowners are improving grazing and irrigation
systems, protecting habitat, and finding that incentive
programs not only benefit wildlife but also can make
businesses more cost-effective.
• Rancher
Kent Throntveit is using U.S. Department of Agriculture
conservation funds to benefit the federally threatened
piping plover on his cattle ranch. Implementing a
rest-rotation grazing system turned out to be a good choice
economically as well as environmentally, the rancher says.
Other landowners helping the plover are receiving U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service Private Stewardship Grants Program
funding.
More good news in Montana
• Following Endangered Species
Act protection, the Yellowstone grizzly bear population has
tripled from about 200 bears to an estimated 600, and the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has proposed removing it from
the threatened species list. In Montana, state and federal
agencies are funding private landowners who volunteered to
help grizzlies by establishing a secure travel corridor,
which lessens the potential for bear-human conflicts.
• Programs helping the Arctic
grayling may make Endangered Species Act listing unnecessary
for the rare fish. State Wildlife Grant funding is helping
the grayling, and a Candidate Conservation Agreement with
Assurances is nearing completion. The Agreement encourages
landowners to volunteer to help grayling on their lands.
Copyright 2006 Environmental
Defense, used by permission. For more information, call
202-387-3500 or see
www.environmentaldefense.org
RETURN TO INDEX
$$
For Counties
1.
Restoring Rivers: Stream Barrier Removal Grants
American
Rivers and NOAA Community-Based Restoration Program River
Grants
Deadline:
December 8, 2010
This
Partnership funds stream barrier removal projects that help
restore riverine ecosystems, enhance public safety and
community resilience, and have clear and identifiable
benefits to diadromous fish populations.
For more
information go to:
http://www.americanrivers.org/our-work/restoring-rivers/dams/background/noaa-grants-program.html
2. San
Francisco Bay Area Water Quality Improvement Fund
Deadline:
January 28, 2011
During the
last three decades, there have been notable successes in
protecting the environmental health of San Francisco Bay.
However, substantial environmental challenges remain. To
help, Congress has appropriated funding since 2008 to EPA
for a competitive grant program that leverages additional
funds to protect and restore San Francisco Bay and its
watersheds. To date, EPA has supported 28 projects and
leveraged almost $12 million to achieve significant
environmental results related to wetlands, water quality and
green development.
For more
information go to:http://www.epa.gov/region9/water/watershed/sfbay-delta/index.htmll
3. Water
Conservation Field Service Program
Deadline:
January 31, 2011
Description: This program provides support to a variety of
cooperative activities, demonstration programs, and pilot
projects to promote and implement improved water management
and conservation in the Upper Colorado Region. Priority will
be given to proposed activities that address one of the
following, listed in order of funding preference: water
management planning, implementation of efficiency measures,
demonstration projects, and water conservation education and
training activities.
For more
information go to:
http://www07.grants.gov/search/search.do?&mode=VIEW&oppId=58611
4. Great
Lakes Fish and Wildlife Restoration Act
Deadline:
December 13, 2010
The U. S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) requests interested
entities to submit restoration, research and Regional
Project proposals for the restoration of Great Lakes fish
and wildlife resources, as authorized under the Great Lakes
Fish and Wildlife Restoration Act (16 USC 941c). The purpose
of the Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Restoration Act (Act)
is to provide assistance to States, Indian Tribes, and other
interested entities to encourage cooperative conservation,
restoration and management of the fish and wildlife
resources and their habitats in the Great Lakes Basin.
Regional Projects are authorized activities of the Service
related to fish and wildlife resource protection,
restoration, maintenance, and enhancement impacting the
resources of multiple States or Indian Tribes with fish and
wildlife management authority in the Great Lakes Basin.
For more
information go to:
http://www.grants.gov/search/search.do;jsessionid=55VLMTYhkJt1tF1Khknd2g3DMGPv5YFjLVnX4vh1XbKL5YzLMb52!-530104428?oppId=58505&mode=VIEW
5.
Fish and Wildlife
Service: Urban Conservation Treaty for Migratory Birds
Program
Deadline:
January 7,
2011
Description:
This
program provides support to protect, restore, and enhance
urban/suburban habitats for birds; reduce hazards to birds;
educate and engage citizens in monitoring, caring about, and
advocating for birds and their conservation; foster youth
environmental education with a focus on birds; manage
invasive species to benefit and protect birds; increase
awareness of the value of migratory birds and their
habitats, especially for their intrinsic, ecological,
recreational, and economic significance
For more
information go to:
http://www.grantstation.com/Members/Toolkit/gov_deadlines/2011q1.asp#jan
RETURN TO INDEX
If you wish to unsubscribe from
the newsletter, please email us with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject
line.
Home
Join The Conservation Leaders Network!
TOP OF PAGE
PO Box 46,
Wedderburn OR 97491
541.247.8079 (phone)
541.247.9521 (fax)
info at conservationleaders.org
The Conservation Leaders Network is a
non-profit, tax-exempt 501(c)(3) organization as determined by the
Internal Revenue Service
Please note:
This site provides links to other organizations for informational
purposes only.
The Conservation Leaders Network has not reviewed and disclaims all
responsibility for the content of these websites.
|