|
Global
Warming Impacts On Forests
“Rising global
temperatures are causing a host of environmental problems
including the loss last year of 10 million acres to
wildfires in this country alone. This is a devastating loss
compounded by the fact that trees help slow global warming
by sequestering carbon,” said Deborah Gangloff, Ph.D.,
executive director of American Forests, during a press
conference held at the National Press Club.
American Forests Launches Global Releaf2 Campaign With Goal
to Plant 100 Million Trees by 2020. American Forests. April
24, 2007.
http://www.pr-inside.com/american-forests-launches-global-releaf-r103054.htm.
Millions of acres of
Canada’s lush green forests are turning red in spasms of
death. A voracious beetle, whose population has exploded
with the warming climate, is killing more trees than
wildfires or logging.
Rapid Warming Spreads Havoc in Canada’s Forests: Tiny
Beetles Destroying Pines. Doug Struck, Washington Post
Foreign Service. March 1, 2006.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/02/28/AR1006022801772.html.
The projected 2◦C
(3.6◦F) warming could shift the ideal range for many North
American forest species by about 300 km (200mi.) to the
north.
Global Warming – Impacts: Forests. U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency.
http://yosemite.epa.gov/OAR/globalwarming.nsf/content/ImpactsForests.html,
Accessed May 1. 2007.
Global forests
currently store just over half of the carbon residing in
terrestrial ecosystems (FAO 2001).
Forests, Carbon and Climate Change: A Synthesis of Science
Findings. A project of The Oregon Forest Resources
Institute/ Oregon State University College of Forestry ODF,
p.12.
Global forests
currently store just over half of the carbon residing in
terrestrial ecosystems (FAO 2001).
Forests, Carbon and Climate Change: A Synthesis of Science
Findings. A project of The Oregon Forest Resources
Institute/ Oregon State University College of Forestry ODF,
p.12.
“The stakes are
high, because climate change will hurt the region and the
forest industry economically,” said Eric Kinglsey, vice
president of Innovative Natural Resource Solutions, a
consulting firm in New Hampshire and Maine. If present
warming trends continue, New England’s sugar maples – prized
by makers of fine furniture - will give way over the next
century to a mix of mid-Atlantic hardwoods, predominantly
hickory, he said. The maple syrup industry would collapse,
and sawmills geared toward northern hardwoods would have to
retool.
Forests Can Make Money While Slowing Global Warming.
http://www.chiefengineer.org/content/content_display.cfm/seqnumber_content/2922.htm,
Accessed
May 1, 2007.
. . . forest fires
are likely to become more frequent and severe if soils
become drier. Changes in pest populations could further
increase the stress on forests.
Global Warming – Impacts: Forests. U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency.
http://yosemite.epa.gov/OAR/globalwarming.nsf/content/ImpactsForests.html,
Accessed May 1. 2007.
Climate change will
exact a major cost on North America’s timber industry and
could drive as much as 40 percent of its plant and animal
species extinct in a matter of decades, according to a new
report from an international panel. . . .North American
forests also will suffer from a warming climate, the report
states, and increases in wildfires, insect infestations and
disease could cost wood and timber producers $1 billion to
$2 billion by the end of the century.
U.N. report warns warming will harm timber industry. Juliet Eilperin, The Washington Post.
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2003669257_warming17.html.
Paradoxically, a
warmer climate may result in an increase in winter damage to
some tree species. If a warmer climate produces a decrease
in snowfall, the frost may penetrate deeper into the ground
and damage tree roots. This type of damage has already been
implicated in the decline and death of hardwood trees in
Canada.
Forests and Global Warming. Prepared by Thomas Curran,
Science and Technology Division. Government of
Canada,
Depository Services Program. April 1991.
http://dsp-psd.pwgsc.gc.ca/Collection-R/LoPBdP/BP/bp254-e.htm.
We know that carbon
markets have the potential to add streams of revenue to
forestland owners, perhaps significant enough to help
conserve forests from conversion to other uses less
beneficial to the climate.
Forests, Carbon and Climate Change: A Synthesis of Science
Findings. A project of The Oregon Forest Resources
Institute/ Oregon State University College of
Forestry/Oregon Department of Forestry, p.15.
CARBON SEQUESTRATION
Through
photosynthesis, forests naturally remove carbon dioxide from
the atmosphere and store it as carbon (i.e., carbon stocks)
in trunks, branches, leaves, and roots, which are often
referred to as “carbon pools.” When forests are disturbed
through events like deforestation (e.g., development),
harvest or fire, carbon is released back into the atmosphere
as emissions of CO2. On a global level, forests are the
second largest source of human-caused CO2 emissions,
contributing roughly 25% of the world’s total CO2emissions –
largely due to forest loss.
Reprinted with permission—The Pacific
Forest
Trust.
If you look at the
sources of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, there are two:
One is fossil fuels and the other is forests,” said Laurie
Wayburn, president of the Pacific Forest Trust, a San
Francisco nonprofit that has led California’s efforts to put
a dollar value on the ability of forests to remove carbon
dioxide from the atmosphere and store it. . . . . The keys
are preserving existing forests through conservation
easements; storing more carbon by increasing the average age
of the trees and selecting for more hardwoods than softwoods
– which also increases the wood’s market value; and making
sure such measures produce an economic return for
landowners. “Climate is a forest product,” she said. “We
can leverage that to increase the net stocks of carbon that
these forests are taking up and holding…in a way that puts a
higher-value forest industry back on the landscape.”
http://www.chiefengineer.org/content/content_display.cfm/seqnumber_content/2922.htm,
Accessed
May 1, 2007.
Under the offset
concept, forestland owners receive payments for the amount
of carbon they store that (1) cancels out other emissions,
(2) are recorded in a registry, and (3) work as if the
emission had not occurred.
The potential
emitters pay the entity making the promise to store a
particular amount of carbon for a certain period of time.
Stavins and Richards
(2005) document that forests can play a significant and
economically valuable role in future climate policy.
Forests, Carbon and Climate Change: A Synthesis of Science
Findings. A project of The Oregon Forest Resources
Institute/ Oregon State University College of
Forestry/Oregon Department of Forestry, p.14
In addition, the
registry has set out models to establish carbon storage
baselines and requires that carbon credit-producing projects
are truly “additional”—that is, they create and preserve
carbon stocks above and beyond what would happen if projects
continued with traditional practices.
California’s
Forest Owners Think Ahead. Cameron Walker. The Katoomba
Group’s Ecosystem Marketplace. September 5, 2006.
Forest management
can contribute significantly to reducing and perhaps even
ending the ongoing rise of carbon concentration in the
atmosphere, providing a cumulative sequestration of 25
billion metric tons of carbon globally over 50 years.
Forests, Carbon and Climate Change: A Synthesis of Science
Findings. A project of The Oregon Forest Resources
Institute/ Oregon State University College of
Forestry/Oregon Department of Forestry, p.28.
Forest management
can contribute significantly to reducing and perhaps even
ending the ongoing rise of carbon concentration in the
atmosphere, providing a cumulative sequestration of 25
billion metric tons of carbon globally over 50 years.
Forests, Carbon and Climate Change: A Synthesis of Science
Findings. A project of The Oregon Forest Resources
Institute/ Oregon State University College of
Forestry/Oregon Department of Forestry, p.28.
Forests of all ages
store carbon, but older forests store more net carbon
annually than younger forests. Although younger forests can
grow and store more carbon at a faster rate than older
forests, the total amount of carbon—the carbon stocks—grown
annually in older forests is greater.
It is helpful to
think of storing carbon in a forest like earning interest in
a bank account. The carbon stock in the forest is equal to
the amount of money in your bank account. The interest rate
of the account is equal to the growth rate of the forest.
Young forests are small accounts with higher interest rates,
while older forests are bigger bank accounts with slightly
lower interest rates. Both are useful and grow over time,
but the older forests store more annually—just like the
bigger bank accounts do.
Reprinted with permission—The Pacific
Forest
Trust.
…establishing a
forest plantation on agricultural land will increase carbon
stores, but converting a productive old-growth Douglas-fir
forest into a plantation with management for timber
production can decrease carbon stores by as much as 45%.
Forests, Carbon and Climate Change: A Synthesis of Science
Findings. A project of The Oregon Forest Resources
Institute/ Oregon State University College of Forestry ODF,
p.27.
Home
|