![]()
County Commissioners Protecting America's Natural Resources HOME ABOUT US NEWS & EVENTS ADVICE TO ADVOCATES CONTACTS NEWSLETTER JOIN |
Climate ChangeGlobal Warming Impacts On Forests“Rising global temperatures are causing a
host of environmental problems including the loss last year of 10
million acres to wildfires in this country alone. This is a
devastating loss compounded by the fact that trees help slow global
warming by sequestering carbon,” said Deborah Gangloff, Ph.D.,
executive director of American Forests, during a press conference
held at the National Press Club. Millions of acres of Canada’s lush green
forests are turning red in spasms of death. A voracious
beetle, whose population has exploded with the warming climate, is
killing more trees than wildfires or logging. The projected 2◦C (3.6◦F) warming could
shift the ideal range for many North American forest species by
about 300 km (200mi.) to the north. Global forests currently store just over
half of the carbon residing in terrestrial ecosystems (FAO
2001). Global forests currently store just over
half of the carbon residing in terrestrial ecosystems (FAO
2001). “The stakes are high, because climate change
will hurt the region and the forest industry economically,” said
Eric Kinglsey, vice president of Innovative Natural Resource
Solutions, a consulting firm in New Hampshire and Maine. If
present warming trends continue, New England’s sugar maples – prized
by makers of fine furniture - will give way over the next century to
a mix of mid-Atlantic hardwoods, predominantly hickory, he
said. The maple syrup industry would collapse, and sawmills
geared toward northern hardwoods would have to
retool. . . . forest fires are likely to become more
frequent and severe if soils become drier. Changes in pest
populations could further increase the stress on
forests. Climate change will exact a major cost on
North America’s timber industry and could drive as much as 40
percent of its plant and animal species extinct in a matter of
decades, according to a new report from an international panel. . .
.North American forests also will suffer from a warming climate, the
report states, and increases in wildfires, insect infestations and
disease could cost wood and timber producers $1 billion to $2
billion by the end of the century. Paradoxically, a
warmer climate may result in an increase in winter damage to some
tree species. If a warmer climate produces a decrease in
snowfall, the frost may penetrate deeper into the ground and damage
tree roots. This type of damage has already been implicated in
the decline and death of hardwood trees in Canada. We know that carbon markets have the
potential to add streams of revenue to forestland owners, perhaps
significant enough to help conserve forests from conversion to other
uses less beneficial to the climate. CARBON SEQUESTRATIONThrough photosynthesis, forests naturally
remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and store it as carbon
(i.e., carbon stocks) in trunks, branches, leaves, and roots, which
are often referred to as “carbon pools.” When forests are
disturbed through events like deforestation (e.g., development),
harvest or fire, carbon is released back into the atmosphere as
emissions of CO2. On a global level, forests are the second
largest source of human-caused CO2 emissions, contributing roughly
25% of the world’s total CO2emissions – largely due to forest
loss. If you look at the
sources of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, there are two: One is
fossil fuels and the other is forests,” said Laurie Wayburn,
president of the Pacific Forest Trust, a San Francisco nonprofit
that has led California’s efforts to put a dollar value on the
ability of forests to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and
store it. . . . . The keys are preserving existing forests through
conservation easements; storing more carbon by increasing the
average age of the trees and selecting for more hardwoods than
softwoods – which also increases the wood’s market value; and making
sure such measures produce an economic return for landowners.
“Climate is a forest product,” she said. “We can leverage that
to increase the net stocks of carbon that these forests are taking
up and holding…in a way that puts a higher-value forest industry
back on the landscape.” Under the offset concept, forestland owners receive payments for the amount of carbon they store that (1) cancels out other emissions, (2) are recorded in a registry, and (3) work as if the emission had not occurred. The potential emitters pay the entity making the promise to store a particular amount of carbon for a certain period of time. Stavins and Richards (2005) document that
forests can play a significant and economically valuable role in
future climate policy. In addition, the registry has set out models
to establish carbon storage baselines and requires that carbon
credit-producing projects are truly “additional”—that is, they
create and preserve carbon stocks above and beyond what would happen
if projects continued with traditional practices. Forest management can contribute
significantly to reducing and perhaps even ending the ongoing rise
of carbon concentration in the atmosphere, providing a cumulative
sequestration of 25 billion metric tons of carbon globally over 50
years. Forest management can contribute
significantly to reducing and perhaps even ending the ongoing rise
of carbon concentration in the atmosphere, providing a cumulative
sequestration of 25 billion metric tons of carbon globally over 50
years. Forests of all ages store carbon, but older forests store more net carbon annually than younger forests. Although younger forests can grow and store more carbon at a faster rate than older forests, the total amount of carbon—the carbon stocks—grown annually in older forests is greater. It is helpful to think of storing carbon in
a forest like earning interest in a bank account. The carbon
stock in the forest is equal to the amount of money in your bank
account. The interest rate of the account is equal to the
growth rate of the forest. Young forests are small accounts
with higher interest rates, while older forests are bigger bank
accounts with slightly lower interest rates. Both are useful
and grow over time, but the older forests store more annually—just
like the bigger bank accounts do. …establishing a forest plantation on
agricultural land will increase carbon stores, but converting a
productive old-growth Douglas-fir forest into a plantation with
management for timber production can decrease carbon stores by as
much as 45%. |
|
|
Masthead photo credits: Rolf Sklar, Curtis J. Carley FWS, NOAA
The Conservation Leaders Network is a
non-profit, tax-exempt 501(c)(3) organization as determined by the
Internal Revenue Service
Please note: This site provides links to other organizations for informational purposes only. The Conservation Leaders Network has not reviewed and disclaims all responsibility for the content of these websites. |